There’s a phrase that dances on the tips of many tongues, often slipping out in written pieces and spoken conversations alike. It’s “comprised of”. On one hand, it sounds formal, polished, and just about right for reports, essays, and serious discussions. But on the other hand, whispers of doubt creep in. Is it grammatically correct? Does it make us sound more intelligent or is it just fluff?
This debate isn’t new. In fact, it has been stirring up dust in the corners of English grammar forums, classrooms, and even among professional writers for years. Some cling to traditional rules like a raft in open water, while others advocate for language evolution and flexibility. But before you pick a side or throw your hands up in frustration,
there’s more to this story. And trust me, it might just change the way you think about English grammar forever.
Many people use the phrase “comprised of” in writing and speaking. However, experts in English argue that it’s not the best choice. The correct term should be “composed of”. This is because “comprise” means to include or contain, making “comprised of” a bit redundant. For example, saying “The team is comprised of 11 players” could be better expressed as “The team comprises 11 players” or “The team is composed of 11 players.” Remembering this small difference can make your English sound more polished and accurate.
Understanding the Controversy Behind “Comprised Of”
At the core of the grammar controversy around the usage of “comprised of” is the belief that it’s redundant and incorrect when compared to more traditional alternatives like “compose” or “constitute.” This language debate has been fueled by critics arguing that the phrase blurs the distinction between the meanings of comprise (to be made up of) and compose (to make up).
“Comprised of” has become a point of contention among grammarians who often assert that the construction “is comprised of” is illogical in the passive voice, as “comprise” already conveys the intended meaning in the active voice.
Despite the traditional views that label “comprised of” as a mistake, its widespread use has led to increasing acceptance in everyday English. However, there is still hesitance to embrace its usage in formal contexts like academic writing, where editors typically prefer alternatives such as “composed of.”
- Perceived Redundancy: Critics maintain that the phrase “comprised of” is unnecessary as “comprise” in the active voice already conveys the intended meaning. This perceived redundancy fuels the ongoing grammar controversy.
- Confusion Between Meanings: The language debate over “comprised of” is further intensified by the argument that the phrase confuses the meanings of comprise and compose. This confusion is believed to result in unclear English phrase usage.
- Illogical Construction: Staunch grammarians assert that the construction “is comprised of” in the passive voice is illogical, as the active voice already conveys the intended meaning with “comprise.”
It is essential to understand that although the usage of “comprised of” is increasingly common, its treatment as standard English is not yet universally accepted. In formal writing contexts, it’s advisable to opt for more widely-accepted alternatives like “composed of” to avoid potential criticism and maintain clarity.
Origins of the Phrase “Comprised Of” in English
The combination of “comprised with of” has a long history in the English language, with occurrences in writings from as early as 1585 and 1613. This long-standing presence does not confirm its grammatical correctness, and opinions on the matter remain polarized.
The Historical Perspective on “Comprised Of”
Despite its extensive history, the phrase’s prevalence does not guarantee its acceptance by all. Nor does a group of writers declaring a usage wrong automatically discredit the construction. It is essential to appreciate the historical usage trends while understanding the linguistic evolution that contributes to language change.
How Renowned Grammar Experts View “Comprised Of”
Notable grammar experts have weighed in on the use of “comprised of.” The Fowler brothers mentioned it in their book The King’s English, while Roy Copperud later distilled the essence of the argument against the phrase, stating, “The whole comprises the parts; thus is comprised of is wrong.” However, it is crucial to recognize that opinions span a wide spectrum, reflecting the ongoing grammar dispute.
Evolution of the Usage of “Comprised Of” Over Time
Evidence of “comprised of” in well-edited publications indicates its ongoing usage throughout the 20th century and into the current one. Examples in literature from authors such as Ashley Montagu and Irving Louis Horowitz, and publications like The Wall Street Journal and The Guardian, validate its continued presence.
Despite efforts by certain editors to remove “comprised of” from texts, such as a Wikipedia editor’s extensive campaign, the phrase garners mixed feelings, drawing ire from some and indifference from others.
By examining the historical use of “comprised of” and following English language history, we can see the complexities and nuances of the phrase’s origins and linguistic evolution. Keeping in mind the insights from grammar experts and historical usage trends, it is essential to balance these perspectives while acknowledging language change and the ongoing debate surrounding “comprised of.”
The Grammatical Debate: “Comprised Of” vs. “Comprises”
For years, grammarians and language enthusiasts have debated the grammatical correctness of using “comprised of” instead of “comprises.” The crux of the argument lies in the perceived redundancy and confusion arising from employing “comprised of” in the passive voice, when “comprise” sufficiently encapsulates the intended meaning in the active voice. The inconsistency in the phrase’s meaning — oscillating between “to be made up of” and “to make up” — further complicates the issue.
To appreciate the intricacies of the “comprised of” debate, it is essential to understand the definitions of the two contenders. The verb “comprise” means “to include” or “to contain.” In contrast, “comprised of” functions as a phrasal verb encompassing both “to be made up of” and “to make up.” The critics contend this duality in meaning generates confusion and hinders clear communication.
“The committee comprises experts in various fields.”
“The committee is comprised of experts in various fields.”
The first sentence is an example of using “comprises” in the active voice, clearly and concisely communicating that the committee includes experts from multiple disciplines. The second sentence, employing “comprised of” in the passive voice—while still intelligible—sparks controversy due to its perceived redundancy and potential for confusion.
As language evolves, the comprehension of “comprises” varies from one person to another. Some may find “comprised of” problematic, while others might encounter no difficulty grasping its intended meaning. The key to overcoming the debate is to adopt a discerning approach towards these two constructions based on their respective contexts and adhere to the established conventions governing their usage.
- Study the context: Accurately assess whether “comprises” or “comprised of” has a stronger and more precise connotation in a given scenario.
- Know your audience: Consider the preferences and sensitivities of your readers when selecting a particular term or expression.
- Stay true to conventions: Adhere to established grammatical norms when writing, especially in formal contexts or academia.
In summary, identifying the subtle distinctions between “comprised of” and “comprises” and acknowledging their unique contextual aptness can foster more coherent and engaging communication that satisfies both linguistic purists and casual readers alike.
Modern Usage of “Comprised Of” in Edited Publications
Despite the criticism and ongoing debate between grammarians, the phrase “comprised of” remains a significant presence in respected and well-edited publications, even as we progress further into the 21st century. This persistence may be attributed to the divergence between prescriptive linguistic norms and the descriptive realities of language use. As a result, analyzing the influence of “comprised of” in media, modern grammar trends, and publication standards help to uncover the intricacies of language evolution and editorial practices.
In recent years, numerous reputable publications have featured “comprised of” in their articles – a clear indication that editors and authors continue to use the phrase in spite of its contentious nature. While some may argue that this represents a decline in editorial standards, the reality is that language and grammar are constantly evolving. As cultural, societal, and linguistic changes continue to shape the way we communicate, our understanding of correctness and appropriateness will also inevitably progress.
In line with the trends showcased in modern media, a growing number of academic and professional institutions have begun to adjust their editorial practices accordingly. While some still adhere to traditional grammar rules, it is evident that a significant portion of organizations accept – or at least, tolerate – the usage of “comprised of.” Ultimately, this demonstrates an increasing flexibility and openness to different approaches within the editorial realm.
“Language is the archives of history.” – Ralph Waldo Emerson
As we consider the continued presence of “comprised of” in edited publications, it is crucial to acknowledge the ongoing debate between those advocating for prescriptive grammar rules and those who embrace the natural progression of language. Inevitably, this conversation will shape future language trends and determine the fate of disputed phrases like “comprised of.” In the meantime, writers and editors should maintain an awareness of this linguistic landscape and make informed choices based on their audience’s preferences and expectations.
Alternatives to “Comprised Of”: Enhancing Clarity in Writing
Using appropriate alternatives to the disputed phrase “comprised of” can help you improve the clarity, grammar precision, and vocabulary of your writing. When you gain a better understanding of suitable synonyms and usage tips, you’ll be able to craft sentences with increased linguistic clarity and confidence, while avoiding the controversy surrounding “comprised of”.
Using “Composed Of” Correctly
Composed of is often considered a fitting replacement for “comprised of,” functioning in a similar way without the attached grammatical controversies. In formal writing, “composed of” serves as an unambiguous choice for conveying the composition of subjects. For instance, you can write:
The research team is composed of five experienced scientists.
By using “composed of” in this sentence, you maintain grammatical accuracy while delivering the intended meaning.
The Active Use of “Comprising” in Sentences
Another alternative is the active verb comprising, which is free from the stigma attached to “comprised of” and expresses similar meanings. “Comprising” indicates the elements constituting a subject while preserving clarity and grammatical integrity. Here’s an example:
The management board comprises six members, each with diverse backgrounds.
In this instance, “comprising” actively conveys the elements constituting the management board, helping maintain linguistic clarity and avoiding the contentious “comprised of.”
Honing Your Writing with Synonyms for “Comprised Of”
Developing your vocabulary with synonyms helps enhance the quality of your writing and circumvent potential grammar disputes. Some synonyms that you can use in place of “comprised of” include:
- Constitute
- Contain
- Include
- Consist of
- Be made up of
Each of these alternatives can help you communicate similar meanings without the risk of grammatical criticism. For instance, you could write:
The menu consists of several appetizers, entrees, and desserts.
By using “consists of,” you effectively convey the elements that make up the menu while steering clear of the controversial “comprised of.”
Expert Advice: Navigating Usage Criticism in Writing
As a writer, language expert guidance can help enhance your writing and minimize the risk of unintentional grammatical errors. One contentious aspect of the English language is the usage of “comprised of.” Recognizing its questioned status is essential for handling grammar criticism effectively. It’s equally crucial to understand that not everyone will agree with every grammar rule, and it’s natural to encounter disputes in language usage.
For those concerned about potential criticism of their use of “comprised of,” consider the following writing advice from language experts:
- Choose alternatives: Use alternative phrases such as “compose,” “constitute,” or “make up” to maintain the integrity of your writing, particularly in formal situations. These alternatives convey the desired meaning without drawing criticism.
- Be consistent: Regardless of your chosen phrasing, consistency is vital to maintain clarity and prevent confusion for your readers.
- Stay informed: Keep up to date with language trends and current grammar debates to make informed decisions about your writing. Watch for shifts in acceptance or rejection of disputed phrases over time.
- Seek feedback: Engage with fellow writers and editors for constructive feedback on your writing. This input can offer valuable insights into areas of improvement and growth.
To ensure your writing remains accessible and professional, it’s crucial to stay aware of current linguistic norms and controversies while staying mindful of your audience’s expectations. By following expert writing advice and carefully handling grammar criticism, your writing will continue to improve and resonate with readers.
Shifting Perceptions: Will “Comprised Of” Become Standard English?
The ongoing debate surrounding the usage of “comprised of” in the English language signifies a potential shift towards its acceptance as standard English. While evolving English standards and future language trends are somewhat unpredictable, its widespread usage in reputable publications and its inclusion in dictionaries like Merriam-Webster as a standard sense of the word indicate that the tides may be turning in favor of “Comprised Of” acceptance.
Despite this gradual change in perception, some linguistic purists continue to argue against its use, which leaves writers navigating potentially contentious waters. It is essential to be aware of the ongoing debate and adapt to the changing landscape while maintaining the integrity of your writing, especially in more formal settings where this kind of dispute can undermine the intended message.
In conclusion, as the English language continues to evolve, it is increasingly likely that “comprised of” will gain broader acceptance without objection. However, until it achieves universal acceptance, it’s prudent to consider using alternatives like “composed of,” “comprising,” and “constitute” in formal writing to avoid any potential pitfalls associated with this contentious phrase. Therefore, it’s best to stay informed and adjust your writing style accordingly, allowing for flexibility and adaptability alongside the ever-changing landscape of the English language.
