‘People Are’ or ‘People Is’: Understanding the Correct Usage

Marcus Froland

Have you ever found yourself in the middle of writing a sentence and suddenly you hit a wall? This happens to the best of us, especially when trying to figure out if “people are” or “people is” sounds more correct. It seems straightforward until it’s not. The English language has its fair share of rules, but for every rule, there’s an exception lurking around the corner.

This very dilemma brings us light on an aspect of English that many find tricky – subject-verb agreement. It’s like a silent gatekeeper, ensuring sentences flow smoothly and make sense to readers. But don’t worry, we’re about to shed some light on this topic. And just when you think you’ve got it all figured out, we’ll introduce a twist that might just change the way you see English grammar forever.

The difference between “people are” and “people is” boils down to grammar rules about subject-verb agreement. In English, the word “people” usually refers to a group of individuals. Therefore, it’s considered a plural noun. Because it’s plural, we use “are” instead of “is.” The correct way to say it is “people are.”

For instance, you would say, “People are walking in the park,” not “People is walking in the park.” Remember that using “is” with “people” sounds odd and incorrect because it mismatches the plural noun with a singular verb form. Always match “people” with plural verbs to ensure proper grammar in your sentences.

Introduction to ‘People Are’ and ‘People Is’ Grammar

In modern English grammar, people is predominantly used as the plural form of person, thus requiring plural verbs like ‘are’. The confusion in usage typically arises from incorrectly treating ‘people’ as a singular noun, which would erroneously lead to the use of ‘is’. For general use, remembering the association of ‘people’ with plural verbs resolves most grammatic dilemmas.

Despite the historical debates regarding ‘persons’ as a more appropriate plural form in some contexts, ‘people’ has prevailed as the standard in contemporary English, except in specific legal writings.

Let’s explore some common grammar mistakes related to plural nouns, subject-verb agreement, and their correct usage in modern English.

  1. Incorrect: The people is waiting for the bus.
    Correct: The people are waiting for the bus.
  2. Incorrect: A group of person are having lunch.
    Correct: A group of people are having lunch.
  3. Incorrect: Many peoples enjoys playing soccer.
    Correct: Many people enjoy playing soccer.

As seen in the examples above, adhering to the rules of subject-verb agreement can help avoid these common grammar mistakes.

Incorrect Usage Correct Usage
The people is participating in the parade. The people are participating in the parade.
Each persons in the room has a question. Each person in the room has a question.
Few person understand the subject well. Few people understand the subject well.

By familiarizing yourself with these rules and applying them in your writing, you can effectively express your thoughts with clarity and precision. The next sections will delve further into the distinctions between ‘people are‘ and ‘people is‘ and help improve your understanding of subject-verb agreement in modern English grammar.

The Grammar Behind ‘People’: Plural Nouns and Verbs

Understanding the proper use of the word ‘people’ in English grammar requires a clear understanding of plural nouns and their corresponding verb forms. In this section, we will explore why ‘people’ aligns with plural verbs, using practical grammar examples to demonstrate proper English usage and subject-verb pairing.

Related:  “Mine as Well” or “Might as Well”? Understand the Difference

Why ‘People’ Aligns with Plural Verbs Like ‘Are’

The word ‘people’ is classified as a plural noun because it refers to more than one individual. In English grammar, it is essential to maintain subject-verb concord or agreement between the subject and the verb in a sentence. Consequently, plural subjects like ‘people’ must be paired with plural verbs such as ‘are’, ‘were’, or ‘have been’.

Using plural verbs with ‘people’ holds true even when referring to a group of individuals as a single entity. The need for plural subject agreement in English grammar necessitates that plural nouns like ‘people’ consistently pair with plural verbs to ensure proper usage.

Examples of ‘People Are’ in Sentences

To further illustrate the significance of subject-verb pairing and understanding subject-verb concord, we can examine several practical grammar examples using ‘people’ and the corresponding plural verb ‘are’:

  1. Many people are going to the concert this weekend.
  2. People are often afraid of strange noises at night.
  3. Only three people were in the shop when the incident occurred.

“There are some people who always seem angry and continuously look for conflict. Walk away; the battle they are fighting isn’t with you, it is with themselves.”
– Anon

These examples demonstrate how ‘people’ functions as a plural subject, requiring the use of corresponding plural verbs to adhere to standard English grammar rules and uphold subject-verb agreement. By consistently applying these guidelines, you ensure proper English usage and effective communication.

The Singular and Plural Forms of ‘Person’

The English language makes clear distinctions between singular and plural noun forms. The term person serves as a singular noun, associating with verbs like ‘is’ and ‘was’. This agreement between the noun person and these singular verbs can be seen in sentences such as:

“Only one person is allowed in at a time.”

“He is a person who likes music.”

While person is the singular form, its plural counterpart, people, is widely used in modern English. However, there is another plural form, persons, which primarily appears in legal and official contexts. Some examples of this usage include:

  1. “6 persons maximum in the elevator.”
  2. “Persons wishing to apply for a visa must meet several requirements.”

In most situations, the plural form people is more appropriate. This preference can be attributed to the general evolution of the language and a shift away from the use of persons in everyday speech and writing. The table below demonstrates the differences between person, people, and persons:

Form Singular or Plural Associated Verbs Example Sentence
Person Singular is, was Only one person is allowed in at a time.
People Plural are, were Many people are attending the event.
Persons Plural (Legal and Official Contexts) are, were 6 persons maximum in the elevator.

Understanding the distinctions between these noun forms and their associated verb agreements will enable you to accurately and effectively communicate your thoughts in English. As a rule of thumb, when referring to more than one individual, use people partnered with plural verbs like ‘are’ and ‘were’. When dealing with specific legal or official contexts, use persons. Conversely, always use person for singular references, paired with singular verbs such as ‘is’ and ‘was’.

Related:  Your Sincerely or Yours Sincerely? Which Is Correct?

The Special Case of ‘Peoples’: When to Use It

Although the term people is commonly used to refer to a group of individuals, there is a particular scenario where the word peoples is more appropriate. This countable noun is specifically employed to denote multiple distinct groups, such as nations, tribes, or ethnic groups, each being considered a unique collective unit.

Understanding ‘Peoples’ in the Context of Ethnic and National Groups

By using ‘peoples’, you can emphasize the collective aspect of various groups, respecting their unique identities, languages, and cultures. Let’s examine some examples to illustrate the proper use of ‘peoples’ in context:

  1. Many of the world’s indigenous peoples have rich cultural traditions and languages that are distinct from those of other ethnic groups.
  2. The native peoples of Australia, such as the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders, have unique customs, beliefs, and languages that set them apart from other populations.
  3. Across the African continent, diverse peoples, each with their own languages and cultural heritages, coexist within the individual countries.

In each instance, the term ‘peoples’ identifies and gives importance to the distinctive characteristics of the various ethnic or national groups being discussed. By opting for ‘peoples’ over ‘people’, you create a clear, respectful distinction that acknowledges the individuality and unique cultural aspects of these populations.

In summary, when referring to multiple distinct ethnic or national groups, it is important to use the countable noun ‘peoples’ to accurately represent and honor their unique characteristics. Such accurate language usage is crucial in ensuring that your writing is both informative and respectful of the diverse populations it discusses.

Exploring ‘Person’ Versus ‘Persons’ Usage

In contemporary language, the term ‘persons’ has largely become outdated and is now primarily seen in legal contexts, where specificity about individuals is crucial. Though once more widely used, ‘people’ has mostly replaced ‘persons’ as the preferred plural form of ‘person’ in modern English. However, in certain legally nuanced or intentionally individualizing situations, the use of ‘persons’ is still appropriate.

Let’s examine some instances where ‘persons’ may still be relevant in comparison with ‘people’:

Usage Context Examples
Persons Legal terminology, official documents and reports. Missing persons report, persons of interest, rights of persons with disabilities.
People Regular modern English usage, both formal and informal. Many people attended the event, people have different opinions on the matter.

The choice between ‘person’ and ‘persons’ often boils down to conveyance of individuality within a group or simplicity in language. In general, the term ‘people’ has become much more widespread and familiar, leading to a preference for this word in everyday conversations and writing.

Regardless of popular use, the term ‘persons’ retains significant importance in legal or formal contexts and documents, highlighting the distinction between distinct individuals and a group as a whole. Here are some examples:

Only authorized persons may enter the premises.
All persons applying for a visa must provide additional documentation.
Persons found vandalizing property will be prosecuted.

Although ‘persons’ now appears infrequently in spoken or written language, its relevance in legal terminology and the rare need for individual emphasis maintain its status as a valid word in more specialized contexts. When speaking or writing in everyday situations, ‘people’ remains the standard plural of ‘person’, aligning with modern English usage.

Related:  Evoke vs Invoke: What's the Difference?

People in Legal and Formal Contexts

In legal and formal documents, specific language is often employed to convey the necessary precision and adherence to established rules. One such instance is the use of the term persons to denote individual accountability or specific legal subjects. This section will explore common phrases and scenarios where this alternative plural form is preferred in legal grammar usage.

Phrases such as “any person or persons vandalizing property” or “missing persons cases” provide clear examples of persons being used in legal contexts. The focus on individual responsibility and the need to address each person involved is often a crucial aspect of legal proceedings and formal documents. These phrases highlight the particular attention given to each person’s role within the legal framework.

Any person or persons found guilty of vandalism on this property will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

In political language, another expression where persons is used refers to “displaced persons.” This term is reserved for populations in legally recognized displacement situations, such as refugees and internally displaced peoples. The use of persons in this context places emphasis on the uniqueness and dignity of every affected individual, while still acknowledging the broader issue at hand.

  1. Refugees
  2. Asylum seekers
  3. Internally displaced persons

It is important to understand the nuances that separate the use of people and persons in legal and formal English. While the two words may be understood interchangeably in casual conversation, their meanings and implications take on greater significance in legal documents and formal contexts. Being aware of these distinctions ensures accurate communication and helps avoid misunderstandings when dealing with matters of legal grammar usage and formal language.

Conclusion: Summing Up ‘People Are’ vs. ‘People Is’

As we’ve explored throughout this article, the correct grammatical form is ‘people are’, with ‘people’ being a plural noun that requires plural verb agreement. When referring to an individual, the singular term ‘person’ should be used, which takes on singular verbs such as ‘is’. By understanding the difference between these two forms, you’ll be able to accurately convey your message in English.

The more archaic term ‘persons’ still appears in specific legal contexts, emphasizing the individuality of each person within a distinct group or situation. This term, however, has been largely replaced by ‘people’ as the standard plural form of ‘person’ in modern English usage, except when legal precision is necessary.

Finally, the term ‘peoples’ is reserved for addressing separate ethnic or national groups, each considered a collective entity with unique identities and cultures. By familiarizing yourself with these grammar rules and the proper usage of ‘people’, ‘person’, ‘persons’, and ‘peoples’, you’ll enhance your English communication skills and avoid common mistakes.